Abstract #1606
Comparison of Different Motion Correction Methods for PROPELLER MRI
Yilong Liu 1 , Zhe Liu 2 , Zhe Zhang 1 , Huailing Zhang 3 , and Hua Guo 1
1
Center for Biomedical Imaging Research,
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of
Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China,
2
Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, New York,
United States,
3
School
of Information Engineering, Guangdong Medical College,
Guangdong, China
Proper reference for motion estimation is critical for
accurate and robust motion correction in PROPELLER MRI.
In this work, single blade reference (SBR), combined
blade reference (CBR), grouped blade reference (GBR) and
Pipe et als latest revised method in which no blade
reference is required (NBR) are implemented and
compared. Simulation results show that all methods above
is accurate enough to generate a good image. For some
special cases of in vivo imaging, SBR, CBR and GBR may
fail to converge, while NBR still maintains relatively
good performance, which indicates NBR is more robust.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Click here for more information on becoming a member.
