We conduct the first systematic evaluation of the performance of three widely used registration software toolkits (FLIRT from FSL, NiftyReg and ANTs employing Spinal Cord Toolbox) in an effort to outline a method for reliable co-registration between anatomical and quantitative (EPI-based) spinal cord MRI. We generate a diverse set of registration pipelines and rank them according to quality of co-registration metrics. We find that ANTs and NiftyReg outperform FLIRT, and we report heterogeneity of specifications for optimal co-registration among software toolkits.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords