The purpose of this study was to determine whether whole-tumor ADC histogram and texture analysis is helpful for distinguishing MFAML from ccRCC. The differences of ADC histogram and texture parameters between MFAML and ccRCC were compared using the independent-sample t test. There were significant differences on ADCmean, ADCmedian, ADC25%, ADC75%, ADC90% and skewness between MFAML and ccRCC. The ADC90% derived from the whole-tumor ADC histogram analysis showed the best diagnostic value in discriminating MFAML and ccRCC. Therefore, whole-tumor ADC histogram and texture parameters can be used as a quantitative tool to distinguish MFAML from ccRCC.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords