We compare the fields measured by a field camera to the fields obtained from B0 mapping at 9.4T. The B0 maps have higher spatial resolution and are therefore taken as a benchmark. We analyse the loss of spatial fidelity due to the lower spatial samples of the field camera and compare two different field probe position calibration and optimisation methods that would help alleviate the problem of discrepancies between field monitoring and field mapping.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.