Meeting Banner
Abstract #4088

A Comparison of Prospective versus Retrospective Motion Correction for Reliable T1-Weighted Neuroimaging

Steven Kecskemeti1, Abigail Freeman1, and Andrew Alexander1

1University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States

Prospective motion corrected MPRAGE T1-weighted images were compared against retrospectively motion corrected MPnRAGE T1-weighted images. 14 young children were scanned without sedation and without the head being stabilized with pads. Dice-overlap of automatic tissue segementation masks (FAST and FLIRT) were used as a measure of reliability. MPnRAGE with motion correction showed exceptional regional label consistency (>=80% Dice overlaps for all 16 regions and >90% in 12 of the regions). Conversely, MPRAGE-PROMO demonstrated lower performance than even MPnRAGE without motion correction.

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.

Keywords