Abstract #1033

Comparison of FerriScan- versus R2*-Derived Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) for Clinical Decision Making in Patients with Liver Iron Overload Disease

Marshall Stephen Sussman¹, Kevin Kuo², Richard Ward², George Tomlinson³, and Kartik Jhaveri¹

¹Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, ²Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, ³University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

This study compared clinical decision making between FerriScan and an R2*-based method in patients with iron overload disease. FerriScan is the current gold standard. However, it is expensive, and data must be transferred offsite. FerriScan and R2* techniques were both used to manage (simulated) patient chelator dosing. The agreement between different reviewers assessing the same FerriScan data was the same as the agreement when the same reviewer used R2*- compared to FerriScan-derived LIC values. Thus, switching to R2*-based decision making from FerriScan is no more likely to cause a difference in patient management than switching from one hematologist to another.

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.