We used shielded RF coil in combination with unshielded PET detector. A microstrip coil and a head-size birdcage coil was used. For microstrip coil, the ground conductor acted as the shield, while for the birdcage coil a cylindrical RF shield was implemented. A PET detector with front-end electronics was implemented 40 mm far from the RF shields. Phantom studies revealed no RF pickup noise in any of these cases. A maximum 16% reduction in SNR was seen for the microstrip coil between PET detector powered OFF and ON conditions. However, the SNR reduction for the birdcage coil was negligible.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords