Meeting Banner
Abstract #2197

Cartesian MR-STAT vs spiral MR Fingerprinting: a comparison

Oscar van der Heide1,2, Mariya Doneva3, Peter Koken3, Jakob Meineke3, Miha Fuderer1,2, Cornelis A.T. van den Berg1,2, and Alessandro Sbrizzi1,2
1Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics and Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Department of Radiology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany

Synopsis

Keywords: MR Fingerprinting/Synthetic MR, Quantitative Imaging

MR Fingerprinting (“MRF”) and MR Spin Tomography in Time-domain (“MR-STAT”) are quantitative MRI techniques that allow multiple quantitative tissue parameter maps (e.g. T1, T2 and proton density) to be estimated from a single short scan. In this work, we compare the accuracy and precision of Cartesian MR-STAT and spiral MRF on gel phantoms and in-vivo. On gel phantoms we get excellent agreement with reference measurements. In-vivo we observe differences in reconstructed T1 values. As for the precision, a more in-depth study is required to take into account differences in noise-suppression mechanisms (i.e. k-space apodization and spiral sampling window).

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.

Keywords