Keywords: Susceptibility, Quantitative Susceptibility mapping
Here, we reproduced the results of the DECOMPOSE susceptibility separation model using new $$$T_2^*$$$-weighted data independently acquired using three clinically applicable sequences and processed with different QSM pipelines. This allowed us to investigate the sensitivity of DECOMPOSE to various dipole inversion algorithms. Good susceptibility source separation results were achieved using a 5-echo GRE acquisition, but maps of diamagnetic and paramagnetic sources from a highly accelerated 5-echo EPI sequence were noisy. When the input susceptibility maps exhibited artefacts, these were exacerbated by DECOMPOSE. Care must be taken not to lose local structural information when using (highly) regularised input susceptibility maps.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords