Keywords: Atherosclerosis, PerfusionRecently, a fully automated QP CMR workflow has been established, which provides measures of stress MBF according to a 32-segmentation model with subdivision into endo- and epicardial subsegments. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR according to the standard AHA 16-segment model (16M-QP) and the newly developed automated 32-segment model (32M-QP) with conventional visual assessment in patients who underwent adenosine stress perfusion CMR imaging followed by invasive coronary angiography and/or coronary computed tomography angiography. Our preliminary data have not shown superiority of diagnostic accuracy of 16M-QP or 32M-QP in comparison to visual assessment of adenosine stress first-pass perfusion imaging.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords