Emma Louise Hall1, Penny A. Gowland1,
Susan T. Francis1
1Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance
Centre,
Echo
Planar Imaging (EPI) is commonly used in conjunction with arterial spin
labelling (ASL) due to short image acquisition times. However EP images are
affected by susceptibility artifacts and chemical shift artifacts,
particularly at increased field strength. Here the use of True-FISP and FLASH
acquisitions are compared to EPI based ASL measurements at 7T,
signal-to-noise ratio and coefficient of variation are assessed for each
acquisition method. Non-EP methods are shown to be advantageous at high
in-plane resolution (1 mm), with True-FISP providing the best SNR, however
slice coverage is limited due to SAR at 7T.
Keywords