Abstract #2747
Comparison of the accuracy in 2D and 4D PCMRI to evaluate oscillating flow in small diameters
Gwenael Page 1 , Roger Bouzerar 1 , Dominique Haye 2 , Dong-Joo Kim 3 , Hack-Jin Lee 3 , Anne-Virginie Salsac 4 , and Olivier Baledent 1
1
BioFlow Image, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France,
2
PFT
Innovaltech, France,
3
Department
of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea,
4
Laboratoire
de Biomecanique et Bioengenierie, CNRS, France
The aim of this study is to compare a high spatial
resolution 2D PC-MRI protocol with a 4D PC-MRI protocol
in a phantom with calibrated thin tubes and
physiological oscillating flows. Protocols were applied
on the phantom in a 3T, Achieva dStream, Philips using
32 head coils channels. Accuracy of the flow measurement
was then evaluated by calculating the difference between
expected and measured flow in each branches. For both
sequences we had an error less than 10%, however 2D
PC-MRI measurement was more accurate. It is possible to
have 4D PC-MRI flow measurement consistent with 2D
PC-MRI measurement
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Click here for more information on becoming a member.
