We compare, using Bloch equation simulation, the relative signal in intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), arterial wall (Wall) and Lumen (i.e., blood), along with the IPH–Wall contrast for two different implementations of the SNAP sequence. The first implementation is the original version (Ver1) that uses a linear phase-encoding scheme post-IR, whereas the second version (Ver2) uses centric slice-encodes post-IR. We show that, although Ver2 appears to be less time-efficient, it actually provides increased signal and contrast for the same acquisition time.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords