Meeting Banner
Abstract #3684

Comparison of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping algorithms based on numerical and in vivo 3T data

Hanneke Geut1, Louise van der Weerd1, and Itamar Ronen2

1Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI Research, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

This study compares the currently publically available algorithms for quantitative susceptibility mapping, including different phase unwrapping, background field removal and dipole inversion methods. Numerical and human in vivo brain MRI data are used for a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the various methods. In 3T in vivo MRI data, phase unwrapping with combined spatial and temporal fitting and background field removal using V-SHARP results in the least artifacts. MEDI and iLSQR are currently the most accurate dipole inversion algorithms, with a significantly shorter processing time for the iLSQR method.

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.

Keywords