Meeting Banner
Abstract #0193

How should we compare QSM results? A correlation based analysis as an alternative to traditional error metrics

Jiaen Liu1 and Pinar S Özbay1

1Advanced MRI Section, LFMI, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States

During the last QSM Workshop, the results of first “Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Reconstruction Challenge” were presented, which was performed to allow a systematic comparison of various QSM algorithms. One unresolved issue was the fact that the comparison metrics did not properly deal with the effect of smoothing. Here, we propose a comparison method based on pearson correlations, which are calculated over 1D lines throughout the QSM volumes, and show its robustness relative to other metrics under the influence of over-smoothing.

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.

Keywords