We compared silent susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) with conventional SWAN (cSWAN) in the depiction of hemorrhagic lesions. We measured acoustic noise and performed phantom and clinical study using silent SWAN, cSWAN, and T2*-weighted images (T2*-WI). Acoustic noise of silent SWAN was significantly lower compared to cSWAN. In clinical and phantom study, the contrast-noise ratio (CNR) for silent SWAN and cSWAN were similar. The CNR for T2*-WI was lower than them. In clinical study, imaging quality was almost the same. T2*-WI had more artifact. Conventional SWAN may be replaced with silent SWAN which yields comparable imaging quality and lower acoustic noise.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords