Mechanical parameters may be underestimated by MR-Elastography if data
quality is not properly monitored to discarded inaccurate and unprecised biased
data. Optimal condition defined by proper spatial data sampling upon λ/a≈[6;9] can
alleviate the quality requirements by lowering Qthreshold, which is defined on each dataset at the drop
of correlation between the quality factor and the targeted mechanical parameters.