In our ongoing study of 13 completed patients, we compared two saturation power levels (2.0 μT vs. 0.9 μT) and two analysis methods (MTRasym vs. Lorentzian line fitting) of CEST for assessing treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A consistently decreasing trend of the CEST signals was observed with the longitudinal treatment when a higher saturation power of 2.0 μT was used with the amide MTRasym analysis method. In contrast, the same trend was observed when a lower saturation power of 0.9 μT was used for the Lorentzian line fitting analysis method.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords