This study explored the diagnostic value of APT and DKI in prostate cancer(PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH), and compared the diagnostic advantages of the two techniques and their relationship with the risk of prostate cancer. Our study have shown that APT and DKI both can differentiate PCa and BPH, but DKI has higher diagnostic value, and have strong correlation with Gleason score.They all have the potential to be used in routine clinical practice as new indicators to evaluate the risk of PCa, and to help early diagnosis and personalized diagnosis and treatment of PCa.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.