Throughout the literature, the methods of quantifying total sodium concentration (TSC) brain maps vary. Some studies use a two calibration phantom approach, some use a one calibration phantom approach, and some use anatomical references to quantify the TSC maps. This abstract investigates the variability of using one method versus another to see if a chosen method will inherently bias the resultant maps. It was found that no bias is provided by one method versus another as they provide no significant variance to the data.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords