Although 3D T2W imaging can make up for deficiencies, such as thick layer thickness, low spatial resolution and no retrospective post-processing, of 2D acquisitions, the long imaging time and uncertain diagnostic benefits have limited its clinical application. We compared the quality of 2D, 3D and CS sense accelerated 3D T2W imaging in patients with rectal cancer and found that 3D T2W imaging resembled CS sense accelerated 3D T2W imaging, both superior to 2D acquisitions, while the latter scanning faster than the former. It’s conclude that CS sense accelerated 3D T2W imaging can substitute the 2D acquisitions.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.