Many MR-EPT reconstruction methods have been published, however, there is a lack of comparative experiments to verify the reconstructed electrical properties (EP) maps. In this work, we compared and validated the phase-based (PB), complex-image-based (CIB), and their simplified methods with ground truth vector network analyzer measurements on different conductivity phantoms. After serval comparative experiment repetitions, the complex-image-based method by Soullié et al.[1] was the most consistent to the VNA ground truth measurements. The proposed setup can be used to compare other MR-EPT reconstruction methods.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords