Keywords: Cartilage, Osteoarthritis, T2 mapping, MR Value, MSK, Relaxometry
Motivation: Simultaneous measurement of multiple parameters during single acquisition saves measurement and post-processing time with reduced motion artifacts.
Goal(s): To evaluate and compare T2 mapping of global and focal knee articular cartilage via MR fingerprinting and conventional CPMG sequences.
Approach: Volunteer and patient knees were scanned with protocol including MRF and CPMG T2 mapping. The two T2 mapping methods were compared in global cartilage, focal cartilage lesions and morphologically normal appearing cartilage segments.
Results: The average bias between the two methods was 17.09 ± 6.3 ms, and correlation was moderate to very high in global cartilage and high in focal cartilage.
Impact: T2 mapping with MR fingerprinting is reliable in global and focal articular knee cartilage in terms of segment bulk T2 value assessment when compared to conventional method. Future study will concentrate on longitudinal change in T2 during patient follow-up.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords