Keywords: Arrhythmia, Artifacts, dyspnea
Motivation: Currently there is no consensus on whether breath-hold (BH) and free-breathing (FB) deep learning (DL) cine reconstruction techniques offer equivalent performance.
Goal(s): To compare the clinical utility of accelerated DL image reconstruction in BH and FB cine, and identify the optimal DL-based cine for different clinical scenarios.
Approach: Compare the performance of DL cine sequences across a general population and specific subgroups, including arrhythmia and dyspnea patients.
Results: Both techniques ensure comparable quality and biventricular function with significantly reducing scan time. BH DL cine (at 10x acceleration) showed better performance in general group and arrhythmia subgroup; FB DL cine sequences benefits dyspnea patients.
Impact: Deep learning cine reduce scan times while maintaining accurate biventricular parameters accuracy and comparable image quality, improving clinical work flow and patient comafort. Our research promotes their clinical use and provides guidance for selecting appropriate sequences in various clinical settings.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords