Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Vessel Wall, Multi‐Contrast, Acquisition Methods
Motivation: The previously proposed qMATCH technique enables efficient and comprehensive evaluation of carotid atherosclerosis in 3D; however, it is unclear which acquisition orientation is optimal in image quality and motion robustness.
Goal(s): This study compares the imaging quality and reproducibility of 3D qMATCH with transverse versus coronal acquisitions.
Approach: We conducted a comparative analysis of qMATCH imaging quality, assessing human reader ratings, apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR), apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR), and reproducibility of T1 and T2 mapping.
Results: Coronal acquisition yielded significantly superior image quality ratings, higher reproducibility and motion robustness, though it exhibited inferior overall aSNR and aCNR.
Impact: The results provide an optimal imaging strategy for using qMATCH in carotid atherosclerosis assessment. We demonstrate a tailored approach by incorporating both transverse and coronal acquisitions.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords