Meeting Banner
Abstract #3539

Assessing the Reliability of SE-EPI MRE for Liver Stiffness Estimation Under Free-Breathing Instruction Compared to Breath-Holding

Timoteo I. Delgado1,2, Sevgi Gokce Kafali1,3, Bradley Bolster Jr.4, Lei Jiang5, Shu-Fu Shih1,3, Kevin Johnson6, Pedro Itriago Leon7, Maria Altbach6,8, Vibhas Deshpande9, David S. Lu1, Steven-Huy B. Han10, and Holden H. Wu1,2,3
1Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Physics and Biology in Medicine Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Department of Bioengineering, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 4US MR R&D Collaboration, Siemens Medical Solutions, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 5US MR R&D Collaboration, Siemens Medical Solutions, Columbia, MO, United States, 6Department of Medical Imaging, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 7US MR R&D Collaboration, Siemens Medical Solutions, Houston, TX, United States, 8Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 9US MR R&D Collaboration, Siemens Medical Solutions, Austin, TX, United States, 10Hepatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States

Synopsis

Keywords: Elastography, biomarkers

Motivation: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provides non-invasive liver fibrosis assessment, but breath-holding (BH) requirements limit its use in certain patients.

Goal(s): To compare liver stiffness (LS) estimates from SE-EPI MRE acquired under BH and free-breathing (FB) instruction.

Approach: Forty-three adults underwent both BH and FB SE-EPI MRE. We assessed the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) among MRE images and measurable region-of-interest (ROI) size. Agreement between LS estimates was evaluated using Bland-Altman and regression analyses.

Results: While FB had lower SSIM values and smaller ROIs, mean LS did not significantly differ from BH SE-EPI, with minimal bias (0.00kPa) and an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.988.

Impact: Free-breathing SE-EPI MRE without explicit motion compensation provides reliable mean LS estimates comparable to breath-holding scans, enabling rapid liver stiffness assessment in patients with difficulty performing breath-holding.

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.

Keywords