Abstract #0794
Comparison of ASL inversion efficiency and CBF quantification for 3 perfusion techniques at 3 magnetic fields
Clement Stephan Debacker 1,2 , Jan M Warnking 1,3 , Sacha Koehler 2 , Jerome Voiron 2 , and Emmanuel L Barbier 1,3
1
GIN, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France,
2
Bruker
BioSpin MRI, Ettlingen, Germany,
3
U836,
INSERM, Grenoble, France
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the
reproducibility across magnetic field of cerebral blood
flow (CBF) quantification using Arterial Spin Labeling
(ASL) methods. Three ASL methods (pulsed ASL (PASL),
continuous ASL (CASL), and pseudo-continuous ASL
(pCASL)) were evaluated at 4.7, 7, and 11.7T in 43 rats.
Among the three techniques evaluated, pCASL appears as
the most reproducible method across magnetic fields.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Click here for more information on becoming a member.
