There is a need to establish robust quantification pipelines to analyze 129Xe ventilation MRI for multi-center studies. Moreover, there is increasing interest in quantifying not only ventilation defect percent, but also regions of low and high ventilation. To this end, we sought to determine inter-method agreement between two different semi-automated quantitative mapping approaches — linear binning and adaptive K-means. The results suggest that once bias field corrections are applied consistently, both ventilation analysis methods agree well when classifying ventilation into 4 bins. Thus, with key steps outlined here, either method can be readily deployed in multi-center studies.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords