Abstract #5487

Comparison of Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) and Myelin Water Fraction (MWF) In-Vivo at 3T

Irene Vavasour^1,2, Anastasia Smolina^2,3, Erin MacMillan^2,4,5, Guillaume Gilbert⁴, Michelle Lam^2,6, Piotr Kozlowski^1,2,6,7, Carl Michal⁶, Alan Manning⁶, Cornelia Laule^1,6,8,9, and Alex MacKay^1,2,6

¹Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ²UBC MRI Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ³Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, ⁴MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markam, ON, Canada, ⁵ImageTech Lab, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, ⁶Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁷4International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁸Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁹International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) shows promise as a myelin-specific MRI technique. Recent publications demonstrate that ihMT contrast is generated by long-lived dipolar couplings between protons on lipid molecules. We tested ihMT’s myelin specificity by comparing it to a more validated myelin measure, myelin water fraction (MWF), in 10 healthy volunteers. The ihMT ratio (ihMTR) correlated with MWF in white matter but MWF had a larger dynamic range. When MWF was zero, ihMTR was non-zero, supporting that ihMTR arises from all lipid molecules, not just those in myelin. ihMTR and MWF measure different, and complementary, aspects of tissue structure.

This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.

Join Here