Meeting Banner
Abstract #2970

Comparison of AIR Coil Technology to Conventional Head Coils for Neuro Imaging

Petrice M Cogswell1, Joshua D Trzasko1, Norbert G Campeau1, Erin M Gray1, Phillip J Rossman1, Daehun Kang1, Matt A Bernstein1, Kiaran P McGee1, Fraser JL Robb2, Robert S Stormont3, Scott A Lindsay3, and John Huston III1

1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2GE Healthcare, Aurora, OH, United States, 3GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States

A 16-channel head coil using novel Adaptive Image Receive (AIR) technology was compared to 8-channel and 32-channel head coils on the Compact 3T system in nine healthy subjects using MPRAGE, FLAIR, GRE, and T2 FSE pulse sequences. Two neuroradiologists graded the AIR coil against the 8-channel and 32-channel coils on signal-to-noise ratio, gray-white matter contrast, lesion depiction, artifact, and overall image quality. On average the AIR coil performed similar to the 8-channel head coil, though not as well as the 32-channel coil. This study demonstrates feasibility of AIR coil technology for imaging of the brain and denotes areas on which future coil designs may improve.

How to access this content:

For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.

After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.

After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.

Click here for more information on becoming a member.

Keywords