The motion in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) image was overlooked in many published studies. Fortunately, several works have been reported to do motion correction for CEST processing. However, the performance of these methods has not been evaluated. The main purpose of this study is to compare the performance of these methods on motion correction for CEST imaging. We used NMSE, MCC, and UI to evaluate the performance of these methods. Our simulation and preliminary in-vivo data showed that the method of Reg2mean works the best.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords