Perfusion measures were compared between VSASL and DSC methods at 1.5T in 28 patients with treated high-grade glioma assigned into 2 groups: “tumor” (with detectable enhancing tumor, n=9) and “non-tumor” (without detectable tumor, n=19). All measures (rCBF and tSNR from VSASL, rCBV and rCBF from DSC) showed significant difference between “tumor” and “non-tumor” groups allowing reliable discrimination. In general, there was moderate to excellent agreement and correlation between these measures derived from VSASL vs. DSC. Hence, VSASL has potential to serve as a viable non-invasive alternative to DSC perfusion in the clinical disease surveillance without the need for exogenous contrast.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.