Keywords: Pulse Sequence Design, Simulations
Motivation: At ultra-high field, magnetisation preparation should be adjusted to obtain an adequate FLAIR contrast. However, such optimisation of the pulse sequence and comparison between preparation types are missing.
Goal(s): This work aimed to set a simulation framework to investigate the timing of the magnetisation preparation at 7T. T2 and double inversion recovery preparations were compared.
Approach: Various preparation durations were investigated using simulations and measurements on healthy volunteers.
Results: The image contrast obtained under simulation was experimentally validated. The T2-preparation gave the most promising contrast although the pulses were more prone to B0-inhomogeneity artefacts than the ones from the double inversion recovery preparation.
Impact: We demonstrated that an adequate FLAIR contrast at 7T can be obtained by optimising magnetisation preparation. Simulations can be used to improve the sequence, such as optimising the magnetisation preparation and readout in terms of timings and flip angles.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords