Keywords: Quantitative Imaging, Quantitative Susceptibility mapping, Reproducibility, Inversion algorithms, Background Field Removal
Motivation: The smoothness of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images varies with reconstruction method used, which may impact the reproducibility of texture features.
Goal(s): To assess the robustness of texture features in QSM images across different background field removal and inversion algorithms used in QSM reconstruction
Approach: Three background field removal algorithms and two inversion algorithms were applied for QSM reconstruction. The inter-algorithm reproducibility of texture features was then assessed in a cohort of 40 subjects.
Results: The reproducibility of texture features varied across different combinations of background field removal and inversion algorithms in QSM reconstruction.
Impact: The robustness of texture features varies across different background field removal and inversion algorithms in QSM reconstruction. The impact of the QSM reconstruction algorithm on texture features should be carefully considered before clinical implementation.
How to access this content:
For one year after publication, abstracts and videos are only open to registrants of this annual meeting. Registrants should use their existing login information. Non-registrant access can be purchased via the ISMRM E-Library.
After one year, current ISMRM & ISMRT members get free access to both the abstracts and videos. Non-members and non-registrants must purchase access via the ISMRM E-Library.
After two years, the meeting proceedings (abstracts) are opened to the public and require no login information. Videos remain behind password for access by members, registrants and E-Library customers.
Keywords